There was an interesting story in the press today about how the Labour administration of Oxford City Council is trying to use its powers of planning enforcement to get a large poster objecting to the St. Clements’ Car park redevelopment removed.  The poster is on the side of a listed building without consent so it is right that it shouldn’t be there but I can’t help finding it odd that the planning department is being so heavy-handed with this when it simply just doesn’t do so much other enforcement work.  The poster was put up with the permission of the occupiers of the building so it does seem rather unfair (if not illegal) of the City Council to try to force the poster to be taken down.

Last night I had an email (it went to all councillors and our local MP so I’m assuming it’s not very private!) which put the matter rather well, I thought:

“I read in the Oxford Times that a sign placed on Finders Keepers Estate Agents protesting against the development of the St Clements’ Car Park has been ordered to be removed by the council planning department as it allegedly infringes the status of the building as a listed property and contravenes advertising laws.

I myself phoned the planning department some months ago about the profusion of satellite dishes appearing in the East Oxford conservation area. I was told by a planning officer that this was a low priority and that the funds were not available to deal with the ‘60 or more’ dishes in the area of which the planning officer was aware, all of which infringed planning law. He also told me that his practise was to send in some cases a threatening letter to the property owner, but if the dish was not removed to do nothing thereafter.

Should we assume that following the threatening letter from the planning department about this sign (and assuming the sign is not removed)  the planning department will then do nothing, as it does with other minor infractions of local planning law ? Or does the council believe that the sign protesting the St Clements Car Park is a special case deserving of unusual resources from the taxpayer to remove ?”

The correspondent may well ask!  I certainly intend to.  It seems a bit of a conflict that the planning department is effectively using resources to stifle very wide public dissent to a scheme that it itself is supporting.  It doesn’t feel very democratic to me.

Your views welcome.   You can also look at the Save St.Clements website.